Main Perspective Current Science Definitions Physical Matter Radiant Energy Celestial Bodies

 

RADIANT ENERGY

When crucial experiments conducted to find evidence of the æther seemed to indicate the constancy of the speed of light in all frames of reference, the scientific community responded by turning all of physics upside down. The apparent invariability of the speed of light prompted many theoreticians to place light on a pedestal of unwarranted height. Without proper substance to base physical reality upon, and armed with a strong mathematical connection between mass and energy, it was generally though falsely assumed by many scientists that light somehow was the core and primal substance of the universe. Ultimately this gave birth to the concept of a photon, where it was thought that light was a real particular substance and propagated physically. Since there was no medium of transmission identifiable in this conception, the source and nature of light suddenly became a great mystery. Instead of simply being a traveling instability in a medium existing in a high state of equilibrium, it was deemed to have a life and existence of its own. It became an enigmatic and indefinable particle without mass. As might be expected, this is ‘poorly understood’. Despite the fact that nothing is better understood empirically than light, to this day, no-one has the faintest idea how light is produced or really works. Every tool but truth has been used to describe light. The pretender on this pedestal must be replaced with the rightful occupant, the true bearer of light, the humble æthum.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maxwell

Mathematicians my flatter themselves that they possess new ideas which mere human language is as yet unable to express. Let them make the effort to express these ideas in appropriate words without the aid of symbols, and if they succeed they will not only lay us laymen under a lasting obligation, but, we venture to say, they will find themselves very much enlightened during the process, and will even be doubtful whether the ideas as expressed in symbols had ever quite found their way out of the equations into their minds---

ALBI: As long as a particle remains at rest there is no radiation, what is different when it is in motion?

Radiant energy is the movement of momentum from one point to another in the isotropic medium. This movement does not only refer to what is commonly called electromagnetic radiation, but to any shift of momentum, either a positive or negative movement. A positive movement is defined as that which emanates from a point in space, and a negative movement as that which converges on a point. Light is an example of the former, gravity the latter. Because the medium always seeks to establish and maintain a state of equilibrium, these positive and negative movements must always work in concert, being merely the outflow and inflow components of a system of circulation. If such a circulation is short circuited, as in the case of an elementary particle, these circulation components are intimately connected by a so-called electro-magnetic field. Momentum then flows by the most direct path from the source to the sink. If the particle is at absolute rest in the isotropic medium, the electro-magnetic fields will be completely captive, and no energy will radiate into the external medium. Any movement of the particle within the medium will upset this delicate balance and allow some of these fields to escape into the external medium, and these propagate as traveling disturbances.

ALBI: Does the energy that escapes from the planet into space each day come from the sun or thermonuclear reactions in the core? Are there other sources of incoming energy?

The Earth radiates a great deal of energy into space each and every day, so that it is fair to assume that this energy is replaced each day. Some energy clearly comes from the Sun, but this could not be expected to penetrate more than a few meters at most. Much of the solar energy is reflected immediately, and is never absorbed in the first place. Some energy wells up from possible nuclear reactions deep inside the planetary core, but this also has limits. If the amount of radiated energy were indeed supplied from such a source, the core would be a massive lump of Bismith and Lead by now. It would require some considerable nuclear stockpiles to keep apace with the rate at which a 13,000 km diameter sphere at 500ºK could dissipate energy. Another source of energy must be assumed to enter into the energy balance equation, that compensates for this massive and prodigious energy outflux. From a distance, the Earth is but a point in space that radiates, so that another form of radiation must flow in the opposite direction to energize this process. Since all forms of energy are based on momentum, this influx must be momentum also. Whereas the outward flux of radiation from the Earth emanates from countless discrete sources, the inflow perceives only the cumulative effect these multiple sources have on the isotropic medium, which is a large and deep negative potential well. Since this well is very smooth, exceptionally stable and extremely large, the external medium responds with a correspondingly large, smooth and stable inflow.

ALBI: Is light made of particles? Is light a movement through space?

Light, is nothing more than a disturbance. Light does not travel through space of itself. In fact it doesn’t even travel at all. Like many other things in the universe, it is somewhat of a clever illusion. Light is a periodic disturbance in the equilibrium of the æther. The reaction of the æther to restore this equilibrium is perceived as light. Science however, has moved far away from this very simple understanding of its elementary nature. One culprit in this misunderstanding has been the tendency to describe light drawing parallels and analogies with similar physical phenomena, and then draw mathematical conclusions by extension. Often this entails the use of strings or coil-springs as illustrations of the physics involved. Portrayal of the character of the light transmission in the æther by scaling mechanical properties of density, elasticity and inertia to the speed of light is false science. Although certain wave phenomena are adequately described using these physical analogies, these fail to properly depict so-called undulations in the æther. It is generally assumed that light is like a sound wave, and is some form of pressure disturbance. The properties of light would then a function of the elasticity and inertia of the media, and restoring forces. However the speed and frequency of electromagnetic radiation would indicate unrealistically high values for the æther by this process. This type of logic would depict the æther as a substance millions of times stronger and more rigid that the finest hardened steel. The flaw in this reasoning is that the æther itself is not an elastic vibrating medium. The source of the radiation vibrates, but the æther does not. A more accurate depiction is that the æther is able to transcribe a disturbance. The æther is not set in motion by a disturbance, but merely reflects the local departure from pure isotropic conditions left behind by the disturbance.

Leucippus

...nothing happens at random, but everything from reason and by necessity--- Leucippus

ALBI: Can light travel forever through space? What happens to the medium when no light is transmitted?

Although a disturbance in the æther requires energy to initiate, once set into motion it is the properties of the æther that perpetuate it. Since it is nothing more than an effort to regain balance and restore uniformity, it actually consumes no energy. Another way of looking at it is to think of the æther as transmitting signals at all times in every direction, but if there is no disturbance then the amplitude of the signal is zero, which in technical parlance would be a Null signal. Corrections to the equilibrium require a finite amount of reaction time, and this reaction time simply appears to travel at the speed of light. Since this corrective response is always from undisturbed isotropic æther towards a disturbance, the apparent motion is away from the disturbance site, creating the illusion of an emitted ray. This is an entirely false impression, as nothing from the source becomes part of this so-called ray. The only thing lost from the source is the momentum required to initiate the disturbance. However, the disturbance itself is not moving, but is just a momentary departure from isotropic perfection. The æther moves toward the instability in an attempt to cancel and stabilize it and repair damage to isotropism. This can be compared to the movement of holes in an electronic circuit, where once a hole is filled a new hole is created in the process, which is in turn also filled.

Doppler

ALBI: If the aether is so dense and energetic, why is it so hard to see? Can the COBE information tell us anything about the aether?

The perfection of the æther renders it exceptionally transparent, making detection almost impossible. Although the amount of real substantial mass contained in it is so tremendous that were it not in motion it would be the most opaque substance imaginable. A stationary æther would exhibit high inertia in the physical domain, and would be a totally impassable barrier. Yet in motion it has such astonishing transparency and fluidity that it becomes physically imperceptible, and can transmit signals almost infinite distances. The MBR is also evidence of the distance signals can travel, as some of this radiation undoubtedly comes from beyond the horizon of directly observable objects, and from sources so remote they are indistinguishable individually. This energy, which is in the process of being reclaimed, is of a very uniform nature, which is also somewhat odd, since the more uniform it becomes the more it is subject to mutual interference. A universe saturated with one dominant frequency is essentially a giant interferometer, where destructive and constructive optical interference can create the illusion of reticulation or hot-spots. Without precise knowledge of æthic densities in intervening space, and the effect on the speed of light, or how the course has altered by refraction and interference, it seems almost impossible to assign correct causes and meanings to any such perceived intensity variations. Recent satellite observations of the MBR indicate that it has a polarity or axis, which has unfortunately already been ascribed to a Doppler effect, suggesting that it is caused by the velocity of the Milky Way Galaxy relative to the universal reference frame. The failure to properly distinguish and regard separately the Redshift and Doppler effect strikes once again, because it automatically forces the assumption that the MBR anisotrpy is motion induced. There are several ways to interperate such observations, either as motion through a fixed reference, or as viewed from a fixed location in a directional gradient. One view only makes sense if the physical universe were infinite in extent, the other makes sense if it is a large though limited sphere. Clearly both these perceptions are worthy of consideration. 

Copernicus

  1. There is no one centre in the universe.
     
  2. The Earth's centre is not the centre of the universe.
     
  3. The centre of the universe is near the sun.
     
  4. The distance from the Earth to the sun is imperceptible compared with the distance to the stars.
     
  5. The rotation of the Earth accounts for the apparent daily rotation of the stars.
     
  6. The apparent annual cycle of movements of the sun is caused by the Earth revolving round it.
     
  7. The apparent retrograde motion of the planets is caused by the motion of the Earth from which one observes.

ALBI: How can the periodic nature of light be explained?

Light is more than just a disturbance, but has a more complex cyclic structure evident in the periodic increase and decrease of so-called electrical and magnetic fields, which move in a coordinated fashion about the ray axis. Since all actions in the entire physical universe are the result of mechanical interaction, then light must also be produced by some form of mechanical stimulation. It is therefore reasonable to assume then that the mechanism that produces organized beams of light is indeed an elementary type of physical machine. To produce the kinds of frequencies seen in the electro-magnetic spectrum, this machine must be moving very fast, and in the kinematical world of the æther this must be a true physical motion. The æther itself is not a vibrating medium, and has no natural frequency. The stimulus needs to come from a physical object embedded in the æther, like an electron or proton.

Miller

...a very striking consistency of their principal characteristics... for azimuth and magnitude... as though they were related to a common cause... The observed effect is dependent upon sidereal time and is independent of diurnal and seasonal changes of temperature and other terrestrial causes, and...is a cosmical phenomenon--- Miller 1933

ALBI: What causes the sinesoidal variations characteristic of electro-magnetic radiation?

The electron normally orbits the proton in the equatorial plane, it being the zone of lowest energy. As the speed of the electron increases, something must change, because it then will have more energy than necessary to orbit at its ground state. If it is sped it up sufficiently, it will jump to a higher orbit, or escape from the proton entirely. However, if increased in speed carefully enough, it will be forced to make a change in its path to accommodate the extra speed. The effective orbital rate cannot change, because the centrifugal forces must remain in balance. If its speed is increased, it has little choice but to assume a zigzag path, oscillating back and forth between the northern and southern hemispheres on the proton. This path is then somewhat like that of a carousel horse, up and down and around and around, which is a form of harmonic motion.

Faraday

 Discovered the Faraday effect in 1845, and the phenomenon named diamagnetism. The plane of polarization of linearly polarized light propagated through a material medium can be rotated by the application of an external magnetic field aligned in the propagation direction, thereby establishing that magnetic force and light were related.

ALBI: What does the electron cast off that appears as light to us?

The light-weight electron is ideal to execute this type of motion, because it uses the massive proton as a stable platform about which it can make rapid oscillating movements. When the electron moves rapidly relative to the æther, it will create disturbances in the equilibrium. The reason these disturbances remain behind in the æther is because an electron is not a solid object, but a dynamic circulation. At the center of the electron is a relatively hard and dense circulating core, enveloped by a comparatively large and spongy induced external circulation. At rest these two features are in concentric arrangements, but become stressed and misaligned by rapid acceleration. An electron moving rapidly in an epicyclical path causes the sink, source and the external induced circulation to fall out of nominal position and phase. At one point in the cycle the external circuit gets ahead of the internal circuit, then 180° later the situation is reversed. If the electron core moves too far out of range of the external circulation, a portion of the induced circulation field will be discarded and leave a disturbance artifact behind in the æther. This small abandoned fragment of the induced field is the electrical field component of the wave. This discarded fragment has many of the characteristics of the electron, being originally part of the electron.

Hooke

Hooke's law states that, within the elastic limit, strain is proportional to stress. The ability of a body to resist a distorting influence or stress and to return to its original size and shape when the stress is removed is elasticity. All solids are elastic for small enough deformations or strains, but if the stress exceeds a certain amount known as the elastic limit, a permanent deformation is produced. Both the resistance to stress and the elastic limit depend on the composition of the solid. For each kind of stress and the corresponding strain there is a modulus, i.e., the ratio of the stress to the strain; the ratio of tensile stress to strain for a given material is called its Young's modulus.

ALBI: What is the difference between the electrical and magnetic fields?

In addition to the shedding of portions of the induced field, the electron also can leave behind evidence of the jet or magnetic field. When the electron oscillates by translating along the polar axis, the source and sink appear to alternately advance and recede from the isotropic medium. When it advances, inflow to the sink increases, and when receding it is diminished. Outlying portions of the jet are then also discarded, and since this advancing and receding occur due to the harmonic epicyclical motion of the electron as it revolves about the proton, the resultant output is a magnetic field with a sinusoidal periodic variation in amplitude.

Lorentz

...Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction hypothesis, which posited that everything was affected by travel through the æther. In this theory the reason the Michelson-Morley experiment "failed" was that it contracted in length in the direction of travel. That is, the light was being affected in the "natural" manner by its travel though the æther as predicted, but so was the experiment itself, canceling out any difference when measured.

ARCI: Does the aether effect the transmission of light due to the flow conditions?

Light always moves at the local speed, which is dependent on the local conditions in the æther. When measured, it will always appear to travel at the local velocity regardless of swifter or more retarded progress through other æther regions previously traversed. Each region of space has its own transmission properties that vary depending on the distance from the universe origin. Frames of reference are in motion according to the motions of planetary or solar bodies, and vortex poles or boundaries. Light on the moving surface of a planet may appear to have one velocity in horizontal directions, but may move slower vertically up than vertically down. The motion of the æther cannot be disregarded since light uses the æther as a transmission medium. Arbitrarily assuming that the speed of light is constant, and always travels in straight lines can lead to a multitude of spatial perception distortions. Light is deflected towards massive objects, not because of any property of mass, but because all large massive celestial bodies are produced by and embedded in even greater vortexes in the æther. An æther vortex is a radial inflow towards a center, and light crossing through that flow will tend to be diverted towards that center also. Æther flow motion in the vicinity of massive bodies is rapid, but in comparison to the velocity of light it is slow, so that the diversion of light is small. Nevertheless, all light essentially travels along large spiral arcs, creating permanent distortions in the view of the cosmos. Since the universe is viewed from the inside of powerful nested vortexes, it is presented always as a virtual image in the sky.

ARCI: The aether is grainy since it is made of particles, how does this effect the way light would traverse it?

The isotropic medium is a granular particulate structure so that there are minimum spatial dimensions due to the finite natures of the density, particle size and velocity. This sets a lower limit to the detail that can be physically represented or dynamically transcribed by the æther. Particles smaller than æthum are not possible, as are wavelengths of radiation shorter than the Mean Free Path (MFP) and velocities greater than maximum æthic velocity. The ability to distinguish fine detail therefore has limits, so that all frequencies of electromagnetic radiation are not transcribed with equal faithfulness. Characteristically as the wavelength approaches infinite length the fidelity approaches unity and with increasingly smaller wavelengths approaches zero and then actually become zero. It does not become zero at a wavelength of zero, but at some positive non-zero value. Shorter wavelengths naturally suffer a greater relative degradation, and this cumulative parasitic loss effect causes signals to eventually vanish entirely, whereas longer wavelengths have more stamina and persist longer. Extremely distant galaxies are not visible at the original shorter wavelengths, as these would be subjected to continuous erosion and in time become too feeble to distinguish from the background isotropy of the æther. The energy siphoned off by this type of parasitic loss becomes once more part of the general latent isotropic energy of the æther. That which remains viable after the subtraction of this eroded portion is simple seen as enormously Redshifted MBR and continues on until it too is eventually swallowed up and reclaimed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fermat

 

 

 

The spiral of Fermat, also known as the parabolic spiral, is an Archimedean spiral having the polar equation:

r2  =  a2 θ

Fermat's spiral has equal area annuli in equal angles.

ALBI: Are other forms of radiation explained by the disturbance of aether?

All radiation is produced by mechanical stimulation of the æther. Generally it is the electron that can perform this best because it uses its leverage against the proton to produce the required degree of frequency and amplitude. Another way nature produces light is by synchrotron radiation. This is generated by an elementary particle moving rapidly through the æther. The enhanced æther flow through the particle sets up an oscillation between the source and sink. Momentum absorbed by the particle enters the sink, and is expelled at the source following a small time delay. This time delay produces phase shifts between the electrical and magnetic fields along the line of travel, and the ensuing misalignments of the inner and outer circulations result once more in the discarding of the remote portions. The discarded fields will propagate as coherent wave fronts just as those produced by the epicyclical path of a captive electron. The primary distinction is that the fields in a beam of synchrotron radiation are perfectly co-axial, whereas the radiation produced by the captive electron is composed of two intertwined out of phase helixes

Lodge

Made valuable contributions to the development of wireless telegraphy, conducted research on electrons, the ether, and lightning, and was greatly interested in reconciling science and religion.

ALBI: This argues for a wavelike form for all electro-magnetic radiation, does this eliminate the photon as a viable concept?

When are directed at a slit, or even a double slit, moving particles produce diffraction. This can hardly be seized upon as evidence of the dual nature or equivalence of photons and particles. That these two phenomena are still separate is actually demonstrated by synchrotron radiation. If the high-speed particle were caused to suddenly veer off course, by deflecting it magnetically, the bow wave simply continues on its original course, because it is not physically attached to the particle. This effect has left many scientists wondering why the electron does not emit this same radiation when it orbits the proton. Since the orbiting electron is apparently continually being deflected into a circular path, it stands to reason that it should be constantly emitting synchrotron radiation. The reason that it does not is because an electron is not in orbit, but in circulation. In the ground state the rotation axis of the electron and proton are parallel and coplanar, so there is no misalignment and discarding of fields. It becomes part of the motion of the æther about a proton. Since there is no stationary æther ahead of it, there is also no interaction or absorption of momentum. Since there is no bow wave energy to dissipate, the electron is basically invisible as it circulates about the nucleus.

 

Editors Desk

 

 

Subject:  GRAVITATION

Re:  Gravitational Forces?

Forces are not real or separate things, but are merely the result of various æthic flow conditions. Force always develops as the result of transfer of momentum. This transfer is an ongoing process at all times in the isotropic medium, but useful mechanical work is performed only when there is a redirection of static potential energy to kinetic energy of flow, and then restored once more to potential energy. When coupled into closed loops, these conversions can become perpetual thermodynamic cycles. Classifying these kinetic flows and the movements they cause as electrical, magnetic or gravitational is ultimately unnecessary, working counter to their proper analysis. Hypothetical forces like the strong, weak, or electro-weak compound this problem and lead science astray into a world of useless technical sophistry. Inventing all manner of intermediate force carrying virtual particles is imaginative, but also futile. Further straying by chasing after forces produced by conjectured and never to be discovered dark and cold matter, will prove to be a colossal waste of time

Comment:

--Many theories of gravity also still assume it to be a force or field extending to infinity  and traveling at least at the speed of light.

 

--Since seemingly acting without any noticeable lag or delay, it has even been suggested that gravitational signals might even travel at infinite velocity.

 

 

 

 

... while those whom devotion to abstract discussions has rendered unobservant of the facts are too ready to dogmatize on the basis of a few observations---Aristotle

HOMI: What transmits gravity? Is it like electro-magnetic radiation?

Gravity as mentioned earlier, is a form of radiation, where the flux is inwardly directed to a common central point. This radiation is produced by the same isotropic medium as that which produces electro-magnetic radiation, but the wave mechanics are entirely different. Normal electro-magnetic radiation is cyclic, where the wave has a net energy of zero if the crests and troughs are summed, which is amply demonstrated by destructive interference. A gravitational wave on the other hand does have a net non zero energy content, which content constantly diminishes to zero as it encounters mass. When the last remnant of momentum is extracted, the wave passes out of existence. A gravitational wave is a collective aperiodic momentum flux towards a central focus. The cause of this flux is the negative sink located at the apparent focus. The strength of this sink depends on the amount of radiation (electro-magnetic) which flows out from that sink. Stars, which are usually extremely energetic, radiate fantastic amounts of thermal energy, and consequently produce very deep and intense potential sinks.

NEWI: What happens to gravity once an object is on the surface of a planet?

A simple hypothetical thought experiment can be conducted to provide an illustration of the æther flow concept of gravity. A one pound metal weight is raised a great height above the surface of a planet (which for simplicity is assumed to have no atmosphere), and allowed to free fall and strike the ground. Given sufficient height it will reach such a speed that the impact will vaporize it the moment it strikes. An instant before it struck, it was still a cold one pound weight, yet when it struck it was instantly reduced to incandescence and dispersed. It is not immediately clear where this tremendous energy comes from. In order to shed some light on this, the experiment repeated and somewhat modified, adding a control element in the form of second identical one pound weight sitting motionless on the surface of the earth next to the experimental weight. Before the experiment begins the temperature of both weights is brought to absolute zero. Each weight is then placed inside a hypothetical enclosure capable of measuring any and all forms of radiation, thermal or otherwise, emanating from each weight, and able to determine the temperature of each object at all times. These enclosures also shield the contents from any external radiation sources. One of the weights is then raised to a very large height, which shall take several days. During this time the temperature of both objects does not remain at absolute zero, but they become warmer and both begin to radiate thermal energy. At first the weight being raised is minutely warmer than the stationary weight, but then as it gets higher it becomes colder. At the highest point it is colder than the weight still standing on the ground. It then begins a free fall to the surface of the planet, which also takes it many days. During this time it is noticed that the temperature of the falling weight drops yet again. By the time it strikes the ground it is very cold, but it is traveling thousands of kilometers per hour. At the moment it strikes the ground, it erupts in a massive fireball, and is also instantly dispersed. After waiting till all the fragments cool to the same temperature as the stationary weight the total energy output of each weight during the experimental period is tallied. It is then found that although the falling weight had a more spectacular finish, its total energy output was no greater than the stationary weight. The stationary weight reached an equilibrium temperature, which was due to the resistance of the mass to the æther inflow of the planet, and the excess energy was radiated off slowly as thermal energy converted to electromagnetic waves. The falling weight, on the other hand, was colder during most of time, and radiated very little, but stored most of its energy in the form of motion of the entire mass. It released this energy in a split second when it impacted. It also radiated a small amount of thermal energy during its descent. In both cases momentum energy was absorbed from the æther and converted into physical motion. In the stationary weight this becomes random thermal motion, in the falling weight this becomes kinetic energy of motion.

In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual---Galileo

NEWI: Will an object fall faster if taken to greater heights?

The final velocity reached by the falling weight was still increasing as it struck the ground, so the question still remains how fast it would have gone if lifted even higher. Is there a height beyond which there is no noticeable further gravitational effect? Truth be told, gravitational influences extend only to the outer boundary margins of a gravitational vortex, placing objects outside this margin subjects them to the influence of the next higher hierarchical vortex. What would be the path of objects placed stationary just inside the margin of a vortex? At the margin itself virtually no centripetal force component exists, and the preponderance of tangential force causes the initial path to become that of a very slow orbit, gradually spiraling inwards. Nearing the planet it would already be traveling in a well established elliptical orbit, and cannot attain to a direct free fall as might generally be supposed. Only when objects are released close to planetary surfaces is anything resembling free fall possible.

Socrates

...his contributions to philosophy were new approaches to knowledge, conceiving the soul as the seat of consciousness and moral character, and belief in a purposively mind-ordered universe ...it is an illusion that we already comprehend the world perfectly and must honestly accept the fact of our own ignorance...

HOMI: What about gamma rays and other radiation from space?

High speed jets offer simpler mechanisms to account for high energy particles without resorting to impractically high internal stellar temperatures. If no obstructing stellar object is present at the vortex center, the inflow will meet little resistance, and can escape as bipolar outflow jets. These powerful jets then continually flush all matter from the central core region. Such ejected matter is constrained within a highly collimated narrow angle particle beam many hundreds or even thousands of light years in length. Particles of matter confined within these jets and subjected to continuous acceleration for thousands of years, eventually reach velocities very close to the speed of light. Even though they are traveling at enormous speeds relative to the central core, they move slowly relative to the local æther velocity and are virtually stationary relative other particles in the flow. Their relative thermal motion is therefore very low. Particles that drift beyond of the confines of the jet encounter virtually stationary æther, plowing into it at almost light speed, generating Gamma Rays, X-rays, and UV radiation by process of synchrotron radiation. No amount of thermal activity can ever routinely produce such gamma rays without risking disruption of the proton or electron itself, but a simple sustained long term acceleration and rapid deceleration of high speed particles by the æther, can gently coax such intense radiation from the æther.

 

...you know that I write slowly. This is chiefly because I am never satisfied until I have said as much as possible in a few words, and writing briefly takes far more time than writing at length---Gauss

FAUSTI: Is it possible for particles to travel from one galaxy to another?

Jets that are part of active galactic nuclei are powered by a central vortex that is part of a continuous circulation. This circulation passes into and through the vortex center, exits at the polar jets, loops onto the galactic plane, and then spirals into the central vortex. Except for the abrupt change of direction at the vortex center, the paths of æther flow streamlines are immense arcs. Ionized atomic nuclei confined within the jets are continuously accelerated over lengthy periods of time and approach the speed of light, then follow the gentle flow streamlines back to the galactic plane with little impediment. When perchance they strike a planetary atmosphere they still have most of their accumulated energy, and produce showers of high speed Cosmic Ray Particles. Cosmic rays are high velocity physical particles, and when traveling through space where the æther is relatively speaking at rest, they will experience drag. Large journeys from galaxy to galaxy cannot be accomplished without suffering considerable parasitic losses severely depleting the velocity. Should it reach another galaxy it becomes indistinguishable from other energetic particles from local sources. Since such particles never travel in absolutely straight line trajectories, their source is impossible to ascertain unambiguously. Particles generated in earlier epochs have long since spent their energy, and have reverted to cold ordinary matter. True extra galactic cosmic rays are impossible due to the lack of a continuous propelling influence to carry them to such extreme distances.

Archimedes

This spiral studied by Archimedes in about 225 BC having the polar equation:

r  =  a θ

 ♦♦♦

 

DISCLAIMER

Although there are links to the biographies of the great men shown throughout these articles, men who devoted their lives to exploring these very mysteries we still struggle with today, their views are not necessarily in agreement with this text. Articles below are also not necessarily in agreement with this website, but are included to show other similar points of view, religious views held or expressed by them do not necessarily reflect those held by the author, and links may lead to other resources also not ideologically supported by this site.

 

Comments and suggestions are welcomed and encouraged, please send to:

pegalys@hotmail.com

To keep up to date on changes to this article, send your email address and it will be used to inform you of updates

Back Next