PHYSICAL MATTER IN THE ÆTHER

Nothing in the entire physical universe is perfectly stationary or without movement of any kind. Though atoms, and the elementary particles comprising them, may patiently hold their station for eons in the rocks and boulders of antiquity, they are in fact animated and constantly renewed with fresh and energetic æther substance from one moment to the next. Elementary particles are small thermodynamic circulatory systems in the æther, that draw in (Sink) momentum from fully charged surrounding isotropic æther and expel (Jet) kinetically spent æther in an endless energy cycle. Reinvigorated æthum are constantly circulated through elementary particles so that nothing from their initial construction remains. All persistent elementary particles are rebuilt completely with brand new parts in a continuous and rapid renewal process that maintains them in a state of perpetual youth, so that they never naturally break down, become worn or expire, and can therefore be considered Perdurable structures. With the exception of ætha, which are indestructible, true permanence of so-called matter is an Illusion. Elementary particles are real and permanent only commensurate with the robustness of their dynamic structures. Particle accelerators and cyclotrons have shown that such structures are quite fragile and vulnerable, and can even be Annihilated. Research into the nature of elementary particles conducted by the established nuclear physics community relies on techniques that subject sub-atomic particles of matter to unnatural forces and conditions, and the result of these abnormal circumstances is the production of particle fragmentation debris, which are not legitimate entities. Attempting to define such shattered remnants in terms of æther mechanics is a waste of time and would serve no useful purpose. The short lifespan of these transient particles clearly indicates that they are nothing more than fractured kinetic loops unwinding as fast as possible, and quite obviously creating an enormous commotion in the process. Providing detailed forensic analysis of these shrapnel-like projectiles is unlikely to yield any clear insight into their role. The make-up and construction of elementary particles cannot be properly deduced from destruction debris, because corrupting the structural integrity of the parent particle causes the fragments fall below minimum levels of stable energy organization. It is far more productive to investigate the nature of the known stable particles than to chase after the exotic and mesmerizing fireworks of particle accelerators. The vast computer resources now vainly attempting to untangle a monstrous web of pseudo particles that are produced in these unnatural high energy environments, would gain greater insight into the structure of matter if instead were used to simulate circulating systems of small inert particles in high pressure isotropic mediums.

ISOTROPISM

HOMI: What is Isotropism, and how is it maintained?

Statistically, head-on collisions are the least likely, so that resolving velocity differentials in the æther requires time. Æthum travel locally at tens of millions of meters per second and traverse tiny fractions of a micron between encounters, resulting in a staggeringly high number of collisions per second. This is a Mathematical Iteration process, Stochastically Averaging out velocity Differentials. Perfect Isotropism is an unstructured dynamic particulate grid where the constituents locally have exactly the same linear momentum, and are disposed in random direction vectors along three dimensions. Such an exceptionally uniform dynamic state responds to disturbances by the rapid restoration of perfect Equilibrium. Velocity variations are resolved by the redistribution of momentum, a process that theoretically continues mathematically to infinity. Of course, as in any medium, this is of limited range practically speaking, as eventually the amplitude of a disturbance falls below the random noise and equalizing signals are lost.

HOMI: What are the properties of the isotropic medium?

Isotropism is a state of maximized Potential (Internal) Energy of the æther, equal to an atmosphere under pressure and capable of performing physical work if able to escape as flow to regions of lower pressure. Individually Æthum have Kinetic Energy in the form of linear momentum, but constrained within the medium as Latent Energy, and since these motions under isotropic conditions are totally random no useful mechanical work is performed. The amount of energy resident in every cubic centimeter of the æther is exceedingly high, and able to carry powerful electromagnetic waves, host intense magnetic fields, and be harnessed into cohesive forces that hold elementary particles together. Almost imperceptible large scale flows cause gravitation, which are able to drive physical elements together into gigantic red-hot balls of matter. There is only one fundamental type of energy existent in the universe, the momentum of physical linear kinetic motion of ætha, which is Intrinsically the same everywhere. Macroscopically it can exist in two basic relative forms, as either ISOPOTENTIAL or ISOKINETIC energy. The mathematical extremes of these conditions can morph in a smooth and infinitely fine transition gradient from one form to the other. Isopotential energy is omnidirectional, nonpolarized and static, and Isokinetic energy is directional, polarized and flowing.

HOMI: How does the medium change from Isopotential to Isokinetic states? What can cause instabilities to form in the aether?

A static isotropic condition will become isokinetic flow along a gradient due to the presence of a pressure differential. Pressure differences, which can exist either as an excess or deficit, can be due to relative density, relative thermal state, or the isokinetic state of the medium. Particles from localities at higher relative pressure migrate by expansion to areas at lower pressure seeking to equalize pressure. Lower density is like a vacuum, such as forms dynamically at a pump inlet, which continually withdraws particles from the surroundings into the inlet. Relative voids also exist when particles have lower average velocities. At the same density such regions are weakly defended allowing the encroachment by more energetic particles from the surroundings. Lower average velocity equates to lower latent energy, which can be maintained in a dynamic state of imbalance by the constant dispersal of momentum by radiation.

ALBI: Can these various flow scenarios account for the fundamental forces science claims to have discovered? Is there a basic principle that can illustrate how energy can be bound into a fixed and self contained system?

Elementary Particles, atoms and galaxies are held in containment by the movements of coordinated flow mechanisms in the æther that mimic cohesive forces. When these flows are functionally identified with objects at various Scales they are called nuclear, weak, electro-weak, electromagnetic, gravitational and universal fields. Singularly, these all appear unique, but are nevertheless all manifestations of the same flow principles, but reflect geometric configurations and particle trajectories feasible at each scale. These flows all share a common operating principle, in that they are continuous energy Circuits that move from a Source to a Sink to a Drain. The drain then becomes a source and the cycle repeats. The point-of-no-return in an energy cycle and maximum isokinetic state is at the drain. This is also the narrowest constriction in a system, and is commonly referred to as the throat. In the æther, as drain efficiency approaches unity, flow velocity approaches the speed of light. Flow is irreversible in sustained source and drain systems, since they act similar to one-way valves. Drains can be function in three basic modes, unobstructed, impeded or occluded. The outputs of unobstructed drains are jets, a high speed stream of particles with a degree of focused kinetic energy. Entrained physical matter introduces resistive drag into flows and is a source of impedance, hindering or preventing the formation jets. Excessive impedance prevents flow altogether causing the drain to surcease. If the drain stalls, flow stops, and the circulation ceases to exist.

ALBI: Matter is so stable that the predicted half life for Hydrogen atoms is infinite, how did they become so stable? What kind of process could produce such robust structures?

Æ Theo Ræm hypothecates that elementary particles are organized from æthum into dynamically persistent forms by the application of forced order, after which they are able to remain stable. Automatically, this implies thresholds or barriers through which they initially must pass before achieving stability. Their phenomenal stability makes it abundantly clear that these barriers function bilaterally, allowing neither Spontaneous Generation nor spontaneous decomposition. It stands to reason that if destruction of particles can only be accomplished through the application of considerable force, then certainly comparable magnitude forces would attend their initial formation. Each particle individually represents substantial energy of formulation, and if affixed by extension to all particles in the universe, indicates energy expenditure of plenitudinous proportions just involved in their creation, ignoring for the moment that required keeping them in operation for countless billions of years. The assumption that consolidation of such volumes of creation energy into all currently existent particles occurred in a brief and singular three minute time interval is extremely naïve and unrealistic impractical science, and can be dismissed merely on the basis of lacking common sense. Realistic creation processes are likely to be more pragmatic and rely on slow, steady and focused actions, and where there is some recognition of the limitations of time and energy resources.

ARCI: It sounds as if a great deal of concentrated work is involved to fashion permanent vortexes in the aether, where are there such conditions as would allow this?

Processes having these qualities are analogous to Forging, where metals are first conditioned by heat then struck with concentrated hammer blows. No matter how large or complex, forges only produce a limited number of blows within any given period of time. In operation, there is a time allowance to preheat the metal, to store mechanical energy in a hammer, and then release that energy during strikes. Many practical considerations, such as quenching previous forgings, furnishing material, and resupplying energy to drive the hammer are also factors. Irrespective of the degree of sophisticated, forges all have common characteristic features, namely a Hammer, an Anvil and a mechanical energy supply source. It matters not if the mechanical energy comes from the arm of a blacksmith or a large heavy steam driven flywheel, or even from the collapsing force of an entire galaxy, the principle remains the same. In each of these methods, energy, stored over relatively long periods, is released during brief moments of actual contact when the hammer strikes the anvil. A work piece, finding itself between the hammer and anvil at that moment, benefits from a greatly magnified application of force. Only force amplified through accumulation can deliver the concentrated impulse needed to squeeze the enormous amounts of kinetic energy required into the exceedingly tiny volumes of elementary particles. The sheer magnitude of this energy surely rules out spontaneous particle creation under any circumstance. Only the most extreme conditions of force and pressure in the universe, as found in the heart of planets, suns and galaxies are suitably energetic to accomplish such feats.

PLATI: Isn't setting a permanent vortex into motion the initiation of an immortal object? Are there temporary vortexes?

Æther is not dependant on matter, but matter is dependant on æther. Logically, a moment in time must have occured when the very first elementary particles were brought into existence by a creative process. Primal physical processes, cannot simply self-initiate, triggered by random fluctuations of temperature, pressure or other natural phenomena in the æther. Fluctuations or variations could not exist in the æther as initially formed since the fundamental natural property of the isotropic æther is a tendency to equalize and diffuse, and not to concentrate and focus, and this nullifies conditions inclining towards self-initiation. Only by intelligent manipulation of æthic properties can this tendency be countered and utilized constructively. Processes not self-initiated are by logical definition initiated, and this requires that agents or causes exist that can shoulder such initiative, have the required knowledge of æther physics, and know how to deal with events that proceed once these processes are set into motion. Some of these processes will continue indefinitely, others will continue for ages and ages then one day end. Protons are examples of an immortal (though not indestructable) vortex objects, suns and planets examples of long lived, though seasonal vortexes. These processes, begun in the extreme remote past continue to this day, have never ended nor is there reason to believe they ever will.

HOMI: What subatomic particles are created first? Where do the other particles come from?

Elementary particles are singular independent entities, and therefore entirely reasonable to assume that mechanisms that create them do so one at a time. Examination of the relative abundances of elementary particles and the atomic elements reveals unmistakable clues to the identity of this particle creation mechanism. Electrons and protons are in equal proportion, whereas neutrons are disproportionately underrepresented. Elemental hydrogen, is the most abundant element, exists without neutrons, but heavier elements do not. Free neutrons are unstable, decaying quickly into protons and electrons, whereas the reverse of this process cannot occur naturally in isolation. From this can only be concluded that more protons than neutrons are in existence in the current universe. Furthermore, the breakup fragments of neutrons are, coincidentally, the exact constituents of hydrogen atoms. In deciding which of these corrivals came first, the proton, electron or neutron, it is determinately conclusive that this honor belongs to the neutron. The construction of particles of physical matter begins first with the neutron, followed then by the transmutation of the neutron into proton and electron by process beta decay disintegration.

ALBI: What holds particles together, are there such things as weak and strong nuclear forces?

The notion that separate forces of cohesion somehow bind together these elementary particles is an unnecessary complication introduced by the new physics of the twentieth century. Only the forces imparted by the impacts of innumerable miniscule æthic particles in an incessant pummeling, which ostensively appears as a separate independent forces, exists in the æther. Since æthic particles are basically nothing more than very slippery microscopic spheres, without external fields, forces or appendages, they cannot grab onto or lay purchase on any other object. They can do nothing but nudge other particles, which is the limit of their influence. Through these uncountable pushing and shoving events statistical motions are induced that become recognizable patterns of flow. Stable geometric dynamic arrangements can then be exploited which are able to function as durable and reliable machinelike mechanisms with infinite persistence if disruptive conditions are not encountered.

Question: What determines the shape of sub-atomic particles? How can they have a surface if they are nothing but a circulation?

The physical world has wide array of unique materials with exploitable properties that can be fashioned into complex shapes required to perform various machine tasks. These tasks are typically the containment and delivery of fuel, management of hot gases, the support of heavy loads and stresses, elimination of friction, and expulsion of waste gases. The æther accomplishes similar tasks without benefit of these marvelous materials which are readily available physically. There is but one material available at the scale of the æthum, and that is more ætha. Making containment vessels or countering stresses must all occur within the Purview of laws governing the properties of the æther. Working æthic devices can only exploit the dynamic properties of a single substance, the æther. These devices must be constructed within three dimensional geometric spaces so that internal structures can be protected. A circular shape is two dimensional, which forms an incomplete external envelope enclosing no volume, and dissipates quickly in the æther. Three dimensional surfaces must be created by revolving two dimensional objects about a third axis creating swept volumes. Such surfaces correspond to the traces of the trajectories of nonintersecting endless loops of high speed particles. For example, rotating a circular string of beads about a diameter creates a spherical array of beads. Unfortunately, no geometric solutions exist that can cover a spherical surface with a single continuous string of beads that does not intersect itself, so is therefore an invalid solution and is excluded. A torus shaped surface does not suffer from this limitation, since a line can be drawn spiraling around the tubular axis of a toric surface which does not cross itself, but does eventually re-join itself. This line can also be intertwined and knotted, yet still not intersect.

ELEMENTARY PARTICLES
 

Hydrogen isotopes, or nucleons, are a precious resource in the universe, since they carry a valuable cargo, the intact neutron, without which further synthesis of elements is impossible. However, even under the most favorable formation conditions the nucleon yield is an incredibly small fraction of hydrogen production. Neutrons are the crucial binder in heavy element production and hydrogen alone is inutile without them. It is safe to say that the time and effort necessary in the generation, capture and preservation of such a valuable material, the essence of corporeality, is taken completely for granted. Hopefully, it is possible to move beyond such benightedness and search for the true method of universal production, beginning with the realization that nothing proceeds from nothing, and that labor is part of all good works. Wishful thinking and arrogance are not helpful in this search. To suggest that matter formed a scant 15 billion years ago, in a frenzied energetic instant Nucleosynthesis that defies rational description is delusional. Baryogenesis resulting from such chaotic randomness would produce equal quantities of anti-particles, which would quickly put an end to the universe in an even Bigger Bang. Three minutes seems far too short for this phase, which seems a violation a cosmic work ethic if not the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of momentum. The gullibility of the general public has contributed to the success of these overextended abstractions, and has provided convenient shields behind which modern scientists conceal their ignorance.

HOMI: What do we know about elementary particles that is not disputed information?

The following list of generally known facts about elementary particles is based on observed and undisputed properties.

HOMI: How did the neutrons seen today survive?  

From simple logical deduction it is possible to conclude with great certainty that the first primitive particles created are neutrons, since observations show that Free Neutrons, not bound together with protons as nucleons, decay quickly into protons and electrons. One can further conclude that only during the brief interval immediately following creation are benignant conditions present to bind safely as a nucleon, a mandatory protective alliance for the survival of a neutron. As neutrons are formed, some inevitably disintegrate into protons and electrons and form neutral and ionized hydrogen, which can then combine with other neutrons to form nucleons. Neutrons combine with these newly formed hydrogen nuclei in the formation of hydrogen (¹H), the isotope deuterium (²H) and tritium (³H), the helium isotopes ³He and ⁴He, and the lithium isotope ⁷Li. Undoubtedly countless neutrons disintegrate before this fusion takes place, which is reflected in the preponderance of atomic hydrogen in the present era. However isotopic forms of hydrogen and other elements protect neutrons from disintegration, providing harborage for them until compounded into heavier elements by subsequent Transmutation processes.

HOMI: Can a neutron be made out of an electron and a proton?

When neutrons disintegrate through β decay, electrons and protons are expelled, and excess energy is discarded. To reverse this process whereby these two particles are recombined into neutrons requires at least the same amount of energy if not more. Not only does this require electrons and protons to form the neutrons, but also additional protons to immediately form nucleons and render the newly formed neutrons stable. These additional protons would need to be present during the precious minutes following fusion, or new neutrons would quickly disintegrate. To produce even the meager number of neutrons currently in existence, this sequence would need to be a very frequent and routine event. Conceivably, such events might occur deep in the interior of very hot suns, where temperatures and pressures are sufficiently high to encourage such *fusion by brute force. It seems pointless to compile neutrons by this very painful and forceful method, when it is known that a neutron produces a proton and electron all by itself without any external input of effort.

*(NOTE: This reaction is possible with more complex heavier metals, by process of Electron Capture, but this type of process cannot occur in isolation and is clearly not a primal one.)

HOMI: Is the neutron the most basic physical object? Where are neutrons formed?

Theoretically then, two ways are conceivable in which neutrons can be created, the easy way and the hard way. The hard way is to try and force electrons and protons to combine into a synthetic union, which requires many particles, lots of energy, and a great deal of luck. The easiest and most obvious method is a process wherein neutrons are created directly. Neutrons pose no danger to other neutrons during the first few minutes that they can exist independently. Without an external charge, there is no tendency to repel adjacent neutrons. When disintegration becomes inevitable, they simply produce the ingredients for hydrogen atoms, which are also neutral. A beam of neutrons, emanating from a hypothetical neutron source, becomes a stream of hydrogen within minutes. Fortunately, such beams are not hypothetical, but real, existing at galactic cores. Galactic jets seen in Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) are the trailing ends of these powerful neutron beams which produce raw materials for the formation of the countless stars in globular clusters, the intermediate star formations that are the primary production sites for helium and other light metal elements. Neutron particle beams moving uniformly at high velocity have a relatively short region, the Nucleon Synthesis Reaction Zone (NSRZ), where such compounding can take place. This short NSRZ contains neutrons, protons, electrons, nucleons, ^xHydrogen, ^xHelium and ^xLithium. Beyond NSRZ, where free neutrons no longer exist, the danger of neutron disruption of nuclei is eliminated. Neutrons beams have the potential to produce abundant hydrogen, smaller quantities of hydrogen and helium isotopes, and trace amounts of lithium. The neutron therefore should be considered the most likely candidate to be the primary and rudimentary building block material of the physical universe. Protons and electrons are then second generation child particle derivatives, the natural offspring born painlessly from the parent neutron. Neutron Beams are particularly elusive astronomical objects to detect, even traveling near the speed of light they would be barely 300 million kilometers long, or not quite the size of the orbit of the earth. Beam diameters would be a microscopic few meters, and the transition region, the NSRZ, where neutron disintegration takes place would be a few thousand kilometers long. Objects of this size are invisible at astronomical distances, making direct observation a difficult and challenging proposition.

HOMI: At what exact moment are particles made?

Neutron beams originate as the initial outflow jets of galactic vortexes, resulting from the high ram pressure developed from the collapsing Archimedean spiral inflows. As æther streams approach the center of a galactic vortex, the flow accelerates and becomes isokinetic. In order to conserve momentum the relative motion between particles decreases and this allows a reduction in lateral separation. Near the vortex center the Archimedean spiral degenerates into the Logarithmic spiral under the enormous pressure at the core, and this allows the flows to be squeezed into permanent microscopic miniature vortical circulations. These newly formed vortices, or more precisely neutrons, are ejected into the jet and form a highly collimated beam, and are accelerated linearly by strong æthic currents.

NEUTRON DISINTEGRATION

The neutron consists of two separate circuits, a high speed low mass circuit, the Ælectra, overlaying a low speed high mass circuit, the Prota. The high speed circuits, are Torus shaped Lissajous. The inner loops of this circuit are single discreet circuits, each with a specific number of ætha, and all following virtually the same trajectory. These toric shaped surfaces have an axial hole which forms a central Venturi. The speed in the inner loops is very nearly the speed of light, so that virtually all relative motion has been eliminated, and consequently little lateral interaction occurs as they pass through the venturi. These loops then continue until arriving back at the start position. Coincidence with the start position occurs following exact discrete integer number of Lissajou cycles. A multiplicity of these loops then run together in parallel, each slightly displaced angularly from the others. In the illustration, the number of circuits shown is greatly reduced for clarity. The loops also precess about the axis, so that the core particles have a very definite outer surface.

HOMI: Since a proton can spring forth from a neutron, did the proton already exist inside the neutron?

The inner Prota circuit, does not have endlessly recirculating loops, but are open loops that eventually terminate in an enclosed zonary defining circle. The outer toric surface of the prota coincides with the inside toric surface of the ælectra. Each truncated sub-circuit in a prota is an inwardly directed spiral path that continuously approaches the center, which falls on an internal circular equatorial ring coincident with the primary radius of the torus.

PROTON STRUCTURE

Paths of ætha in the Prota circuit are decaying telescopically elongating spirals, continually losing momentum as they approach this central massive ring. The mass ring is as close to a true circle as nature can produce, and likely to be the densest object in the universe. Ætha at the center of this circuit are in intimate contact with neighboring particles and remain there until their forward momentum depletes and they are ejected. Whereas the space inside the ælectra is a void, the same space in the prota is completely filled to a very high density, with a resulting apparent mass almost 2000 times as great. (for a better description click here)

HOMI: Why does the neutron disintegrate when by itself?

The prota circuit, is completely enveloped by the ælectra circuit, and thereby isolated from direct contact with the external isotropic medium. Therefore, only the ælectra can induce and maintain a secondary external circulation, effectively preventing the prota from receiving an energy influx required to maintain circulation. The small but significant energy loss which results is slightly greater than the amount of energy input required for the normal maintenance of circulation, causing a slow erosion of energy. The entire neutron system then gradually spins down until reaching an instability threshold, leading eventually to disassociation and physical uncoupling of the two circuits. This running down process and fissile conclusion requires about 1010 seconds for completion. Free of the masking effects of the ælectra the prota generates an external circulation through flow induction, and becomes a proton. Free of the prota, the ælectra becomes an electron. Unlike the neutron, the proton and electron are both stable because both each have access to an unending supply of energy present in the external isotropic medium, so that whatever energy is consumed is replenished immediately.

HOMI: Why must the neutron remain with a proton in order to remain viable?

Neutrons are more correctly defined as compound primary particles, not elementary particles. Neutrons are being made somewhere in the universe at all times, even today. There are undoubtedly many ancient neutrons still present in this era, but there has been ceaseless production ever since the very first primitive prototypes. The existence of unbound neutrons can only arise from three sources, newly minted matter, natural radioactive decay of heavy elements, or released through bizarre high energy experiments by mad scientists. During each of these existences neutrons are exposed to the hazards of independent life, and age very quickly. Of the countless neutrons liberated during atomic and thermonuclear bomb testing, none have survived to this day, and all of them have become hydrogen nuclei. Once conscious of the small percentage yield created during the initial natural formation stages, it seems shameful and immoral to destroy them in this manner. Neutrons bound to protons as nucleons are relatively safe from harm. In this state a neutron is a parasite upon the proton, drawing from it the necessary angular momentum to keep itself energized. This bond is entirely similar to other elemental bonds, consisting of interlocking circulations. This bond is quite useful to the proton, since the neutron is able to serve as an intermediary circuit between protons, performing a function similar to an idler wheel, providing a smooth counter-rotating surface that acts as arbitrator between protons. The regions where circulations overlap is a common shared territory, so that before two circulations can join, they need to discard the energy equivalent of this in the form of binding energy, which manifests as Mass Defect. Conversely, when particles are separated this energy needs to be returned in order for them to be restored to their original mass. The fact that this is due to the presence of overlapping physical contact points can be seen reflected in the Magic Number effect, and the ever increasing numbers of isotopes of heavier elements. Functionally a neutron is an electron having no residual charge, but with a mass comparable to a proton. When bound as single nucleons, neutrons and protons orbit each other about their common center of mass, much like the orbital behavior of protons and electrons. Being of almost the same mass, there is no tendency to enter into high speed orbital patterns like protons and electrons. Without the high speed there is also virtually no centrifugal force, resulting in very small intimate contact orbits, where technically speaking, the lighter proton actually orbits the neutron.

HOMI: Is there any relationship between circulating loops and quanta?

Ætha at the core of elementary particles travel in organized isokinetic loops, in which the relative motion is extremely small, and they complete thousands of circuit passes before becoming depleted and ejected. Even small velocity differentials introduce instabilities sufficient to cause expulsion. The speed of ætha in these loops must remain constant to within one part in many millions to maintain stable kinetic systems. It is not possible, for single ætha to appreciably change speed and be ejected as an individual, since each is surrounded on all sides by others all traveling cooperatively together. Entire loops lose momentum as a group, becoming unstable and disintegrating, releasing discrete quantities of ætha. In the physical world this is perceived as a Quantum, or the smallest discernable incremental energy fluctuation. Vacant loops must be refilled with new energized ætha from the external medium, where energetic ætha plentiful, but traveling in every conceivable direction. Converting isotropic to isokinetic flow requires that the majority of them are redirected. Head-on collisions are not a practical way to accomplish this redirection, because due to Newton’s third law of motion, an equal and opposite reaction results, which in balance produces no change. However, multitudes of glancing collisions gradually bend the paths of æthum in the desired direction. Before ætha can enter an isokinetic loop, random isotropic motions must be organized and regimented by systematic flow conditioning. This change cannot be accomplished inside a single loop, but requires many repeated passes that progressively induce flow in the desired direction.

Source to Sink to Source

The electron is a system comprised of a venturi, a core particle, and an external induced circulation. At the throat of the venturi the isokinetic state is the highest, and relative velocity lowest.  The general mass flow always has one half the mass moving in the opposite direction to the other half, when the particle is at rest. The individual particles of the aether (which are rather fancifully represented here in this illustration) internally follow the same trajectory as the electron but are a filament of  Mobius Strip, and are reduced to the most elemental form. Since the mobius is Chiral, it results in a prefered direction of rotation in all subsequent orbital structures.

An elementary particle has an inlet and an exhaust. An exhaust or source propagates in a spherical wave front as a wave of overpressure, and an inlet or sink propagates as a spherical wave front rarefaction. A source needs to discard its surplus to a sink, and a sink needs a source to supply its deficit. A source and sink within range will develop a system of flow from one to the other. The range will depend on the size and strength of source and sink. If in close proximity with essentially no distance between them, there is little to interfere with the flow, the source will flow in an unimpeded stream directly to the sink. If some distance apart, the isotropic medium will encroach upon the stream from the sides and will hinder the flow. Since in this case much of the energy of the source is directed toward the sink, less is directed to the external medium, resulting in a pinched off venturi shaped stream. If widely separated, direct flow in an uninterrupted stream from the source to drain becomes impossible, but the flow moves as part of a general migration. Such a path is a gauntlet of numerous twists and turns eventually reaching the sink following countless detours. If the sink and source are greatly separated, a flow regime forms wherein the likelihood that any æthum leaving the source will ever actually arrive at the sink is low, and only the momentum component can reach the sink. This still resembles flow, but statistically few if any of the original ætha completes the journey. Finally a point of separation is reached where the dissipation into isotropism renders the sink and source disconnected entirely, with no flow of any kind present.

HOMI: How do particle vortexes travel through the aether without friction?

Elementary particles do not travel through space as solid spherical objects, but as massive conglomerate assemblies of æthum. Such assemblies negotiate paths through the obstacle course of a surrounding viscous æthic atmosphere, which naturally offers resistance to motion analogous to aerodynamic drag. Since the speed of æthic motion is immensely high, the effect of this resistance on slow moving objects is insignificant. As objects approach the intrinsic speed of the æthic medium, noticeable impedance develops, becoming virtually infinite at the speed of the isotropic medium. Elementary particles are approximately spherical; however, such shapes quickly produce more resistance than is typically observed. Clearly, something other than a simple blunt sphere must necessarily account for the peculiar drag characteristics the æther displays.

HOMI: What shape do elementary particles have, and how does this affect their flight through space.

A theoretical machine can illustrate movement of such relatively large objects through the æther. Imagine a very tiny jet engine with a weathervane-like shape, which always adjusts the heading into the prevailing local wind. This engine produces thrust which is dependent on the speed relative to the surrounding atmospheric medium. It has internal drag also dependent on the speed. When stationary, the thrust approximately equals the drag. As it begins to move relative to the atmosphere it develops thrust, but consequently also suffers internally induced drag. This engine is very carefully engineered so that the external thrust is always around 99% of the internal drag regardless of the speed. This seemingly hopeless engine can never hope to gain on the prevailing wind, but can at best forestall itself being swept away in the flow. When placed in a flow it loses ground because the thrust is always slightly less than the induced drag. It will slowly accelerate in the direction of flow, causing the velocity to constantly decrease relative to the prevailing wind, which in turn reduces the drag and thrust forces. As the speed approaches the flow velocity, the rate of velocity change decreases also, eventually approaching a relative standstill. An absolute standstill condition can never actually be achieved, since this is an asymptotic relationship, the slower it moves relative to the wind, the tendency to be swept downwind also lessens. Flow about this little craft produces acceleration which decreases exponentially. Seen from an external frame of reference the craft appears to be constantly accelerated by the flow, but this acceleration rate is constantly diminishing.

HOMI: How does this affect inertia?

Elementary particles viewed as small aerodynamically efficient machines raise fundamental questions of whether anything actually travels when particles move. If in reality the center of circulation is simply migrating along through the flow, and nothing actually moves, then mass inertia can be better defined as the amount of work required to increase the rate of circulation through the particle. Such a circulation has the inclination to seek the lowest energy state, a condition where the external flow is zero. Positive changes in external flow increase internal flow, thus increasing internal resistance, resulting in negative thrust. Thrust, whether positive or negative will produce acceleration. The faster a circulating system migrates through the flow the greater will be both the internal resistance and internal momentum, which will cause an apparent mass increase. As the velocity of the center of circulation approaches the maximum velocity of the isotropic medium the internal resistance will eventually match the resources available to accelerate it, making it mechanically impossible to accelerate particles to speeds above that of the local isotropic medium.